I'm having difficulty with getting spamc and spamassassin behaving identically.
Even when I run spamd without --nouser-config and --local, I get different scoring for a test mail. The result is that if I try to use spamc instead of spamassassin in my -procmailrc, a lot of spam gets through. Spamc is a whole lot faster, though. Is there some explicit documentation on what one should remember when migrating from spamassassin to spamc?
Suggestion to help diagnose the problem:
Grab an email or two in mbox format.
First feed the email through spamassassin --local, and note what rules hit in x-spam-status.
Second feed the email through spamc (with spamd started with --local), compare the x-spam-status for differences.
Generally the difference is the result of bayes training, and you'll get different BAYES_ tests.
If that's not the issue, post some of the results from the above test.
