Good afternoon, Matthew,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Matthew Thomas wrote:
> I'm not trying to unsubscribe from the list, but I thought that I would
> mention that I, for one, don't have any such headers on any of the list
> emails I receive. So a simple "check the headers" answer to people asking
> for unsubscribe info may not be sufficient, though the below response is.
I apologize! I hadn't realized that either 1) some mail servers
strip those headers off, or 2) some mail clients refuse to show all the
headers. I'll try to provide a more useful response next time.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Cheers,
- Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"...exploiting this vulnerability would cause the RPC service to
fail, with the attendant loss of any RPC-based services the server
offers, as well as potential loss of some COM functions.
...Although Windows NT 4.0 is affected by this vulnerability,
Microsoft is unable to provide a patch for this vulnerability for
Windows NT 4.0. The architectural limitations of Windows NT 4.0 do not
support the changes that would be required to remove this vulnerability.
Windows NT 4.0 users are strongly encouraged to employ the workaround
discussed in the FAQ below, which is to protect the NT 4.0 system with a
firewall that blocks Port 135."
-- http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-010.asp?frame=true
"Microsoft is betting that customers using 7-year-old Windows NT
4 Server--35 percent of the total--are ripe for an upgrade."
-- http://news.com.com/2100-1012-994437.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Stearns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Mason, Buildkernel, freedups, p0f,
rsync-backup, ssh-keyinstall, dns-check, more at: http://www.stearns.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
