I wrote: > The first rule says that there was no rDNS record; that's bad, so > a lot of points are assigned. Then the second rule says that the > (non-existent) rDNS record did not match AOL; well, duh!
To which "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responded: > I wonder if this might work: meta AOL_MESSED_UP ( NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO && FAKE_HELO_AOL ) describe AOL_MESSED_UP Let's not compound the felony here score AOL_MESSED_UP -2 Indeed, this fixes the problem (after correction of IP to UP) in a much better way than reducing the individual scores. Thank you. Is there a way to specify that all rules of the FAKE_HELO type should be skipped if NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO holds, or would I have to add the above for each? -Marcel van der Goot But I guess that kind of rule would have to be added for each of the FAKE_HELO tests
