From: "Marcel van der Goot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I wrote:
> > The first rule says that there was no rDNS record; that's bad, so
> > a lot of points are assigned. Then the second rule says that the
> > (non-existent) rDNS record did not match AOL; well, duh!
>
> To which "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responded:
>
> > I wonder if this might work:
> meta AOL_MESSED_UP ( NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO && FAKE_HELO_AOL )
> describe AOL_MESSED_UP Let's not compound the felony here
> score AOL_MESSED_UP -2
>
> Indeed, this fixes the problem (after correction of IP to UP) in a much
> better way than reducing the individual scores. Thank you. Is there a
> way to specify that all rules of the FAKE_HELO type should be skipped
> if NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO holds, or would I have to add the above for
> each?
Not that I know of. But then, I am relatively new here.
{^_-}
