On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 08:51, Jennifer Fountain wrote: > Does bayes filtering resolve 100% of your spam problems? My pres of IS > thinks that bayes filtering is the end all that ends all of spam. He > thinks if we only use bayes we will stop spam entirely. > > Can anyone make a statement on this? I may have to buy a commerical > product because I cannot get spamassassian to do it with my > configuration - we currently use qmail-scanner. >
The SpamAssassin custom rules mentioned on this list plus razor and DNS tests (no RBLs) hit about 96%+ of my spam. Before, I used site-wide bayes, but it wasn't very effective due to the diversity of my users. Recently, I've set up bayes so that each user has their own database. People have commented that they haven't seen an escaped spam in a while, but I'll have to wait a little longer for hard numbers. I'm currently using a 100% open source solution: qmail-scanner + clam + spamassassin on qmail + vpopmail + courier-IMAP. What problems did you have with qmail-scanner? - Jon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrator, tgpsolutions http://www.tgpsolutions.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
