Yeah, there's probably be an easier way to write this, but in the interest of time here's what I ended up with (and it works):
bayes_ignore_header X-MessageWall-Score header MW_SPAM_15_AND_19 X-MessageWall-Score =~ /1[5-9].*/ describe MW_SPAM_15_AND_19 Messagewall scored between 15 and 19 score MW_SPAM_15_AND_19 1.00 header MW_SPAM_20_AND_99 X-MessageWall-Score =~ /[2-9][0-9].*/ describe MW_SPAM_20_AND_99 Messagewall scored between 20 and 99 score MW_SPAM_20_AND_99 1.50 header MW_SPAM_100_AND_999 X-MessageWall-Score =~ /[1-9][0-9][0-9].*/ describe MW_SPAM_100_AND_999 Messagewall scored between 100 and 999 score MW_SPAM_100_AND_999 2.00 I hadn't thought of the bayes_ignore_header line until you mentioned it, too. Good idea. ;) Thanks, Nate -----Original Message----- From: Bob George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: I need to write a rule with a 'greater than or equal to' eval uati on. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >You may have to break this up into two rules like this: > >header MY_SPAM_1 X-MessageWall-Score: =~ /1[5-9].*/ >describe MY_SPAM_1 message wall scored between 15 and 19 >score MY_SPAM_1 1.00 > >header MY_SPAM_2 X-MessageWall-Score: =~ /[2-9][0-9].*/ >describe MY_SPAM_2 Message Wall scored between 20 and 99 >score MY_SPAM_2 1.00 > > Would: header MY_SPAM_1 X-MessageWall-Score: =~/(1[5-9]|[2-9][0-9]).*/ describe MY_SPAM message wall scored between 15 and 99 score MY_SPAM 1.00 work? - Bob
