Bob George wrote:
[ re: rescoring whitelist/blacklist ]
> I'm thinking +/- some small multiple of spam threshold will suffice.
> Any spammy content will drive it up, non-spammy down (esp. with
> bayes) and AWL won't go nuts on 1st post. Any comments?

I'm a little surprised at the trouble this seems to cause some people;
in about a year and a half running the ISP filter server here, I've yet
to see much more than "simple" mail-volume-exceeds-processing-capacity
problems.

But making the whitelist and blacklist scores smaller is probably not a
bad idea.

I've yet to meet any legit mail that's scored more than ~20 (before
Bayes/RBLs/AWL), so you might want to keep the whitelist score in the
-15 to -20 range, maybe a bit larger.  Most FPs have been in the 5-8
range.

The blacklist score should probably be equal magnitude in case one user
really REALLY *REALLY* doesn't want to receive nominally legit mail that
has been globally whitelisted.  I've got a few of those here.  :/

-kgd
-- 
"Sendmail administration is not black magic.  There are legitimate
technical reasons why it requires the sacrificing of a live chicken."
   - Unknown

Reply via email to