FWIW, I don't pass this list though SA. I don't closely examine all the headers in all the mail I receive. I do tend to check out mails that are spam that skip by SA. In a very large percentage of the ones checked lately - like50%+ - the SWE mark is used.
I've now changed my SWE score to 0, but still, a small positive number isn't likely to push anyone over unless you have other spammy-ness characteristics. Other than people on this list-serv, which I wouldn't be impacted negatively by a FP, I don't know a single person or business with whom I do business that uses SWE. In short, no personal or business related mail I want to receive has SWE. I *do* understand your rant about wanting a perfect world, and that giving positve scores to SWE seems unfair. I tend to agree. *But*, given my and I expect most others' experiences with SWE, it's much more likely to be a spam indicator than not. Cheers, Greg ================================================================= Sloop Network & Computer Consulting Gregory Sloop, Principal [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.sloop.net PO Box 16990 Portland OR 97292 v. 503.251.0452 ================================================================ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kelson Vibber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:52 PM Subject: Re: Habeas status? > At 01:27 PM 3/11/2004, Gregory Sloop wrote: > >I've NEVER, to my knowledge, ever received a SWE marked mail that was > >legitimate. > > Not even Justin's post in this thread a two hours ago? > > Kelson Vibber > SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net> >
