I may be misinterpreting your question, but a negative score is not an indicator of spam, but rather a strong indicator of non-spam. So a -8 is supposedly very strongly non-spam.
Is that what you were asking?
-glenn
Butrus orman wrote:
why i dont understand is why this total -8.0 ? and nonspam
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.8 tests=HABEAS_SWE
autolearn=ham version=2.63
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 16:59, Steve Thomas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:52:00PM -0800, Kelson Vibber is rumored to have said:
At 01:27 PM 3/11/2004, Gregory Sloop wrote:
I've NEVER, to my knowledge, ever received a SWE marked mail that was legitimate.
Not even Justin's post in this thread a two hours ago?
Or any of mine?
Remember that you're not likely to notice them when they're part of a legitimate message, but they stick out like a sore thumb when you're perusing your false negatives. The fact that you're reading this (assuming you didn't +5 the HABEAS_SWE rule) means that you're getting legitimate mail from people/orgs that use the mark properly.
