lol thanks Anders...now if only spamd would catch it on my side....I was told it may be bayes filtering causing spamd to hang, so I've disabled bayes for now.
James On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:52:06 +0100 "Anders Norrbring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As you can see, your example get tagged here... > > X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > X-Virus-Scanned: by Eset NOD32 at the-server.net > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.9 tagged_above=3.0 required=7.0 > tests=DEAR_SOMETHING, LINES_OF_YELLING, > LINES_OF_YELLING_2, NA_DOLLARS, NIGERIAN_BODY1, > NIGERIAN_BODY2, NIGERIAN_BODY3, NIGERIAN_BODY4, > RISK_FREE, UPPERCASE_50_75, URGENT_BIZ > X-Spam-Level: ********* > X-Spam-Flag: YES > > > Anders Norrbring > > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > > Fr�n: James Genus Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Skickat: den 16 mars 2004 19:39 > > Till: Bob Apthorpe > > Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > �mne: ***SPAM***Re: spamd not adding headers > > > > Hi Bob > > > > A full example is below...as you can see there are no > > X-Spam headers... > > > > We're running SA 2.63.... > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > > > > > > > > Morning all, > > > > > > I've been getting a number of messages do not included > > > the x-spam headers. When scanning the message via > > > spamassassin, it's tagged as spam correctly. However, > > > spamd seems to miss it altogether. > > > > > > I searched the archives and saw a few other posts > > > along similiar lines, but no definitive answer. > > > > It would help if we could see the full message headers > > (Received lines > > and X-Spam-Checker-Version, for example.) There's not > > much we can tell > > from partial headers and the message body. > > > > -- Bob > > > -- James Genus Jr. 207-633-9600 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
