Ahhhh,
So the AutoLearn line is stating that the msg was accepted as.....ham in this case? I see now. So basically, know i know that the Bayes-Learning is working OK. Once I figga out a way to manually teach SA Outlook HAM & SPAM, I guess, like u said, Bayes headers will start appearing.
Thanks.
Regards,
Julian Milano
IT Manager
Davenport Group
79-81 Coppin Street (PO Box 12) Richmond Victoria 3121
Ph : (613) 8416 6666
Limits of Liability and Disclaimer - Davenport Industries is not liable for any loss, damages, claims, cost demand and expense whatsoever and howsoever arising in connection with this email transmission. The receiver of this transmission shall ascertain the accuracy and suitability of this data for their purposes. Although computer virus scanning software is used by Davenport Industries, the receiver shall be responsible for their own virus protection and Davenport Industries shall not be held liable for and subsequent loss, damage, cost or expense.
This email and any attachment is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error you are prohibited from disclosing, copying or using the information contained in it and please inform us by reply email and delete.
-----Original Message-----
From: Yackley, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2004 01:31 am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: No Bayes in headers.
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No Bayes in headers.
I think I read that if you do not find the word "bayes" in any
of your emails headers, then Bayes is not working?
Here's an example of part of one of my headers:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
davmail.davenport-industries.com.au
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0
tests=CLICK_BELOW,Dav_DJs_01
autolearn=ham version=2.63
X-Spam-Level:
To me, the Bayes system seems to have classed this email as HAM-
so it's working, eh?
Regards,
Julian Milano
IT Manager
snip
Hi Julian,
Not quite true, if bayes does not find enough existing "tokens", you
will not get a "BAYES_XX" hit in the tests. But in general if Bayes is
working, sooner or later you should see some of those results in the
tests= section.
In the case of this message, bayes did not classify it as ham, but the
message did score low enough for the bayes auto-learn system to "learn"
it as ham. Possibly the next time a similar message comes along it will
actually get a low "BAYES_XX" test.
HTH,
matt
