I wasn't trying to start a name calling session among countries (we have enough people doing that).
My point was simply, why is the URL not used that exists in the msg body of these spams to help flag it, and instead all the attention placed on the header? The guy making the comment about Canada ignoring US domains was perhaps not off base in that for Canadian business email accounts that do not deal in sales across the border, giving someone the option to block body text URLs in emails outside of Canada doesn't sound all that unreasonable to me. For the past year I always sent SPAM complaints both to the ISP owning the header IP and the ISP of the URL. The header was always forged and resulted in none of the sites I reported being shut down while I know of 10 websites that I shut down by doing this for the body URL. Not too good for a year's work of wasted mornings but nevertheless, more productive than doing nothing. At least my emails to the other host URL ISPs may have cost them a penny to process.
