mmmmh? spot a spammer ............. Evan .. what phone #'s do you use .. I would love to add it to my bigevil list ...
>>> "Ilan Aisic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/23/04 01:59AM >>> Hi Evan, Just wanted to to remark that sending your messages to "Recipient list suppressed" is not appreciated. First of all, just like "Undisclosed Recipients" it surely triggered a rule in header_abuse.cf. Secondly, in my case, your mail did not file itself automatically in my SA List mail folder but instead waited in my regular inbox... Regards, Ilan > -----Original Message----- > From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 7:10 AM > To: Recipient list suppressed > Subject: Help: Am I blacklisted? > > > So a number of people didn't receive e-mails I send. Often, > it's the same > person who gets one but not another. ISP's vary. I run Merak > which uses a > SpamAssassin engine, and sent myself an e-mail - and it's > marked as spam. > The full headers below: > > Received: from espphotography.espphotography.com ([127.0.0.1]) > by espphotography.com (Merak 7.2.0) with ASMTP id DEMO > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 > 20:52:35 -0800 > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:52:34 -0800 > To: Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Spam] Plus package > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > X-Spam-Flag: YES > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.88 required=5.00 > tests=FORGED_MUA_EUDORA,BAYES_60 version=2.61 > X-Spam-Level: ***** > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.2.2) on > espphotography.com > > The message contained a phone number - nothing more. > > Is there some problem on my end that may be causing ISP's to > reject my > message? If this message was a phone number and scored a 5.88, I'm > wondering if a full message might be higher or flat out be > rejected at the > MUA level. > > Forged MUA: I'm using Eudora as it says. > > Bayes_60? Why?! > > Any help appreciated. > > Thanks. > > Evan > > > >
