Heh, "undisclosed" in a recipients list leave the mail sorted into my
"probably junk" folder in OE. And all that ever pops in there is spam
these days. So I almost automatically use it as fodder for training
Bayes on email that otherwise slips through.
{^_-}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Donovan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> mmmmh? spot a spammer ............. Evan .. what phone #'s do you use .. I
would love to add it to my bigevil list ...
>
> >>> "Ilan Aisic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/23/04 01:59AM >>>
> Hi Evan,
>
> Just wanted to to remark that sending your messages to "Recipient list
> suppressed" is not appreciated.
> First of all, just like "Undisclosed Recipients" it surely triggered a
rule
> in header_abuse.cf.
> Secondly, in my case, your mail did not file itself automatically in my SA
> List mail folder but instead waited in my regular inbox...
>
> Regards,
>
> Ilan
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 7:10 AM
> > To: Recipient list suppressed
> > Subject: Help: Am I blacklisted?
> >
> >
> > So a number of people didn't receive e-mails I send. Often,
> > it's the same
> > person who gets one but not another. ISP's vary. I run Merak
> > which uses a
> > SpamAssassin engine, and sent myself an e-mail - and it's
> > marked as spam.
> > The full headers below:
> >
> > Received: from espphotography.espphotography.com ([127.0.0.1])
> > by espphotography.com (Merak 7.2.0) with ASMTP id DEMO
> > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004
> > 20:52:35 -0800
> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0
> > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:52:34 -0800
> > To: Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [Spam] Plus package
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> > X-Spam-Flag: YES
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.88 required=5.00
> > tests=FORGED_MUA_EUDORA,BAYES_60 version=2.61
> > X-Spam-Level: *****
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.2.2) on
> > espphotography.com
> >
> > The message contained a phone number - nothing more.
> >
> > Is there some problem on my end that may be causing ISP's to
> > reject my
> > message? If this message was a phone number and scored a 5.88, I'm
> > wondering if a full message might be higher or flat out be
> > rejected at the
> > MUA level.
> >
> > Forged MUA: I'm using Eudora as it says.
> >
> > Bayes_60? Why?!
> >
> > Any help appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Evan
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
