On Mar 22, 2004, at 5:27 PM, John Andersen wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2004 19:27, LuKreme wrote:
What I
meant to ask was if the claim to be compliant was itself a indicator or
spam (like the old fictions house bill claims of 4 years ago), and if
so, how strong.

Heh, my guess is you answered your own question. Have you EVER gotten a legitimate email with canspam mentioned that was not in fact spam?

Well, this was he first message I noticed with the disclaimer.

Legitimate opt in lists seldom mention this sort of thing.

Good point.

(and thanks also to Vivek Khrea who sid much the same thing)

--
#242755 <jshock221> a freudian slip is when you say one thing but you're really thinking about a mother.
<Spadgeroonie> no, a freudian slip is sexy underwear your mother wears





Reply via email to