From: "Anders Norrbring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > �mne: Re: .biz domain tagged?
> >
> > Anders Norrbring wrote on Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:52:28 +0100:
> >
> >
> > > Received: from edit (edit.the-server.net [192.168.111.30])
> > > by mail.the-server.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FAE1099
> > > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:35:02 +0100 (CET)
> >
> > so your own machine is edit.the-server.net
> >
> > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > that's different = not added by Outlook
> >
> > > Received: from unknown (HELO edit) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] with
login)
> > > by smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2004 10:35:32 -0000
> > >
> >
> > Now, this is completely different and SA possibly can't determine the
host
> > it came from, so it uses the next received line or just skips the test,
> > don't know.
> >
> > Conclusion: look how to enable MIDs in Outlook.
>
>
>
>
> Well, I Google'd for a while... And on the page
> http://extelligence.ringlet.net/roam/archives/000018.html I found;
>
> "I could scarcely believe that, so seconds after the meeting there I was,
> googling for Outlook 2003 Message-Id, and sure enough, there it was: on
the
> first page of results, a news bulletin which, among others, states that
> Outlook 2003 only includes Message-ID's when sending e-mail through an
> Exchange server. What really got my goat, though, was the reason for
> omitting the Message-Id header: you see, users complained that their
machine
> names were visible on the Internet!"
>
> So, it's a "feature" in my Outlook 2003 to *not* include the Message-Id
> header.. Jesus!
>
> So, how can we go about to make the MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT detection skip
> clients which adds the mailer tag:
> "X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510", or at least Build
11?
> Outlook 2003 do add that, so can the detection engine be told to check
that
> and not tag up the e-mails as spam because of the erroneous "Message-Id"
> tag?
>
> Anders Norrbring
> Norrbring Consulting
> (with a faulty mail client)
Complain loudly to Microsoft. *I* am not going to change MY rules to cater
to Microsoft catering to spammers.
{^_^}
