Title: Spam categories as ham...

I got an interesting email today that bayes was added to bayes as a ham.  The email was clearly a spam (which we have received many from before).  As you can see below it scored 0.0 on the basic test.  It received a bayes_56 scoring as can be seen below.

It seems that the domain sayzsw.com seems to be clean in regards to bayes and thus it levels out the score as can be observed below.  Is there a way that I can tweak bayes to reset or set a customized score for an individual entry or to remove the entry entirely?  Basically I want to remove sayzsw.com from bayes so that this message would have been considered spam and not relearned as ham in bayes.

Mar 25 13:19:11 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: bayes token 'Culver' =>0.994296296296296

Mar 25 13:19:11 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: bayes token 'b.html' =>0.992426229508197

Mar 25 13:19:11 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: bayes token 'H*F:D*sayzsw.com' => 0.0489090909090909

Mar 25 13:19:11 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: bayes token 'H*p:D*sayzsw.com' => 0.0489090909090909

Mar 25 13:19:11 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: bayes: score = 0.568817003743332

Mar 25 13:19:11 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: running raw-body-text per-line regexp tests; score so far=0

Mar 25 13:19:11 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: running uri tests; score so far=0

Mar 25 13:19:12 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: auto-learn? ham=0.1, spam=12, body-hits=0, head-hits=0

Mar 25 13:19:12 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: auto-learn: currently using scoreset 3.  recomputing score based on scoreset 1.

Mar 25 13:19:12 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: Score set 1 chosen.

Mar 25 13:19:12 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: auto-learn: original score: 0, recomputed score: 0

Mar 25 13:19:12 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: Score set 3 chosen.

Mar 25 13:19:12 vjo-lxutil-07 spamd[24012]: debug: auto-learn? yes, ham (0 < 0.1)

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.8 tests=BAYES_56 autolearn=ham

        version=2.63

Does this make sense?

Gary Wayne Smith

Reply via email to