On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 07:27, Tom Emerson wrote: > On Thursday 25 March 2004 10:53 pm, Jonathan Tai wrote: > > The other relatively simple thing to do would be to route her mail > > through your server. (I'm assuming your server runs SA and filters out > > a good percentage of spam.) Set her domain's MX to your server, and on > > your server set a static route to her current server. Then you can both > > stay on your platforms of choice. > > That is EXACTLY what I've started doing for my mom -- works great, but... > > I'm not sure how to get SA to "learn" from what she classifies as ham/spam. > She is using outlook express, so getting pristine copies of message to pass > to sa-learn will be difficult at best. [further munged by the fact that SA > is running on my server for which she essentially doesn't have shell > access...] > > Any thoughts on how to easily train messages with this setup?
I think someone suggested this already, but I think the easiest way to do training would be to keep a copy on your server. That involves you reading your mom's mail... make sure she's okay with it first. The other way would be to do what DSPAM does (I think). Tag each message with a unique header and keep a copy. Then when your mom sees a missed spam, have her forward the spam back to your server, which grabs the unique ID, and re-classifies that message and feeds it to Bayes. I don't know any pre-existing software to do this at the moment, though. - Jon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrator, tgpsolutions http://www.tgpsolutions.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
