I'll chime in. We had a server on their blacklist for 48 hours. The evidence they supplied was absolutely unusable for tracking down where on the server the offending email had come from. They had x'ed out the subject, from, to, server names and contents. We try to do the right thing by dumping spammers, educating users, inspecting cgi scripts, reviewing maillogs, etc - Spamcop could be a little more helpful.
At 09:15 AM 5/2/2004, Greg Cirino - Cirelle Enterprises wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 6:08 PM Subject: Re: OT: Spammer sues SpamCop
| That is a given. I have a friend who runs a verified opt in list that | gets popped onto one or more black list sites when some goof-off wants | off the list and can't be bothered to read headers or footers to find | out how to get off. |
This is the main problem with SpamCop IMO
We don't use them and frankly wish they would go away because they FP regularly.
Their hearts might be in the right place, but their methodology is IMO found wanting.
Greg
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch, Intersessions
