Matt Kettler wrote:
Firsthop *ONLY* applies to dialup/dynamic IP lists. None of the lists that fired are dialup lists.
I just ran a grep on the rules for notfirsthop and realise this now, sorry for the lazy post.....
In this case, it looks like the RBLs are claiming 200.78.33.237 was running an open proxy. SORBS last scanned it august of 2003, but nobody has ever requested rescan or challenged the listing.
The SORBS ones can be cleared up pretty easily, if the user goes to www.dnsbl.sorbs.net and looks up their IP, they can request a re-scan.
Yes, but as it was a from a user in an internet cafe on a mexican DSL provider's link, chances are there are more listed ip's, and the when the caf� boots up tommorrow equally they'll get a different address. (it's prodigy-infinitum - they operate on mostly Dynamic IP DSL) I've seen a good few listed recently.
Should this be considered a bug? - a score of nearly 6 just for using a net caf�? how could i lower the score here?
