>-----Original Message----- >From: Smart,Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 2:15 PM >To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) >Subject: Standard Versioning for SARE files > > > >Would it be possible to standardize the way SARE rules sets >are versioned? >It would make reporting this in RDJ much simpler.
We definetly want standards. Something we have been working hard towards. > >I suggest we use the "RCS" format for revision numbering on >the first line >of the file. If you use RCS to maintain your source, this would be >automatic. Man rcsintro if unfamiliar. RDJ could then use >'ident' to get >the version number. I'll look into it. > >Also, I suggest that all files end with a ##EOF so you are >sure nothing was >truncated. LOL, that is supposed to be one of are standards now. However I forgot to do it on the recent coding.cf update. You may LART me now. LART me good. --Chris
