>-----Original Message----- >From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 2:21 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [semi-OT] SURBL praise and stats
*snip* > >Very impressive. Just you wait ;) > >Kudos and thanks to all involved in making SURBL go. :-) *snip* >spam. The SURBL hosted version of big/midevil isn't performing >very well >for me, but I'll keep an eye on it to see if it improves. > There are numerous reasons why: 1) I use RBLs to block at the MTA level. So BigEvil don't see as much to add. 2) I've taken a step back from bigevil. The reason is simple, Bigevil is going to change. There is no reason to have 3 SURBLs in the future. 3) There is work being done so that we can ALL contribute to WS. Very cool stuff in the making. (We love ya Paul, even if you're Canadien!) 4) My efforts will go into WS. Bigevil will remain to tag a different set of domains. The more dynamic domains. There will also be a BigEvil like file generated from WS so that the people who don't want the net test, can download a BigEvil formated file. >total number of spams caught by SA that have surbl-hosted >big/midevil URI > grep "May 12 " /var/log/maillog |grep BE_URI_RBL | wc -l > 151 Man I need to update more often. Everytime I check a domain, they already have it! Stearn is a machine! ;) > >Unique hits for big/midevil > grep "May 12 " /var/log/maillog |grep BE_URI_RBL |grep -v >WS_URI_RBL |grep -v SPAMCOP_URI_RBL |wc -l > 17 See! The only reason I keep BE going is for those people not using the SURBL test. I'd really like to write another Mr.Wiggly sometime soon! --Chris
