Much as I hate to say it, for client-side spam-filtering SpamBayes (either the Outlook plugin or the POP3Proxy) is very, very good. It's what I use at home.
|-----Original Message----- |From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 14:22 |To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) |Subject: SAProxy (last free version) and SARE, and thoughts. | | |I worked on a buddies CPU this week. Installed the last free version of |SAProxy and all the SARE rules plus others. (Is that saying I'm running |SARE++?) Worked GREAT! SAProxy version was 1.2x I think. Based |on the 2.55 |version of SA (yuck.) But all in all it worked wonderful and |spam got sent |to a spam folder. | |HE was very happy. I wasn't. For end users it still sucks a$$ |they have to |download the junk. Particularly when the ISP _DOES_ use SA. |But a default |install. They give no means to tweak settings at the server |level. Hell they |don't even tell end users about it. (Actually they do allow |you to right |subject rules. Whoopie!) | |Its just a bummer for me to see what is probably THE best |antispam setup a |pop3 client can use, then realise it still sucks because it is |at the client |end. | |We need to get the word out to more admins. Perhaps if we can |just get Kobe |Bryant to say "Spamassassin" just once on camera? :P | |Chris Santerre |System Admin and SARE Ninja |http://www.rulesemporium.com |'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, |not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' |Charles Darwin |
