Jonas Eckerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2004 14:07:50 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: > > > SARE had done some experiments with a custom eval that would > >also check for 20-50 words without "tie in" words like : a, > >at, is, the, of, on, that, have, had, and,....... > > If someone does decide to pick this up, I really hope it'll be > in it's own separate rule-set as it will be heavily language > dependant.
Good point. Note, though, that for the rules like this I've seen, words are defined as matching /^[a-z]+$/. For most (but not all) non-English text, you're unlikely to get through many words without using a non-ASCII letter. -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC
