On Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:45:13 AM, Alton Danks wrote: > Just so you know. We get legitimate email from users with latinmail.com. I > understand that latinmail.com may be mostly spam so I'll just whitelist them > on > my side.
I've whitelisted latinmail.com in SURBLs. I did note that they were on ws.surbl.org, which in turn comes from sa-blacklist. Bill Stearns if you see this, please consider removing them from sa-blacklist. latinmail.com may be somewhat spammy, but it may be non-spammy enough to not block on. > Question. We've been using the sa_blacklist and sa_blacklist_uri rulesets from > before the new surbl rules. My understanding is that the ws_uri_surbl > essentially replaces the sa_blacklist_uri ruleset so I removed the > sa_blaclist_uri rules. Are there other rulesets that have been replaced by the > surbl rules? sa_blacklist? Bigevil? EvilNumbers? BigEvil.cf + MidEvil.cf is available as be.surbl.org, however Chris and Paul are probably not going to develop those further as fixed domain lists, instead merging the enumerable domains into sa-blacklist and therefore ws.surbl.org eventually. BigEvil will then evolve into a ruleset with only wildcarded domains which are difficult to enumerate. If you're not already using sc.surbl.org, people report good results, including when using it with ws.surbl.org. > Everything has gone so well on the anti-spam side since the new surbl rules > that we really haven't paid a lot of attention to possible overlaps to older > rules. (read thank you for surbl.) On behalf of everyone who's made SURBLs possible, thanks! Glad to hear it's working well for you. :-) Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
