On Friday, May 21, 2004, 4:45:32 PM, Jeff Chan wrote: > On Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:45:13 AM, Alton Danks wrote:
>> Question. We've been using the sa_blacklist and sa_blacklist_uri rulesets >> from >> before the new surbl rules. My understanding is that the ws_uri_surbl >> essentially replaces the sa_blacklist_uri ruleset so I removed the >> sa_blaclist_uri rules. Are there other rulesets that have been replaced by >> the >> surbl rules? sa_blacklist? Bigevil? EvilNumbers? > BigEvil.cf + MidEvil.cf is available as be.surbl.org, > however Chris and Paul are probably not going to develop > those further as fixed domain lists, instead merging the > enumerable domains into sa-blacklist and therefore ws.surbl.org > eventually. BigEvil will then evolve into a ruleset with > only wildcarded domains which are difficult to enumerate. I should clarify that probably means you want to keep both BigEvil.cf and ws.surbl.org in the long term, but that be.surbl.org may not be too useful in the future since the static domains from it will go into ws instead, and BigEvil.cf will have wildcarded domains that can't go into a SURBL. So if you were using sa-blacklist and BigEvil before: 1. Change to ws.surbl.org 2. Continue using BigEvil.cf Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
