Hello Greg, Tuesday, June 1, 2004, 10:31:14 AM, you wrote:
>>> I've got a consistent problem with explcit email getting through SA> SA... >> What score does Bayes assign? >> Have you told Bayes that these mails are spam? SA> It's doubtful I'm using Bayes, as this is simply a "filter and forward" SA> server to an internal GroupWise system. If you have the ability to capture and sa-learn emails, then Bayes will help. >> What extra rulesets from rulesemporium.com are you using? SA> MRWIGGLY SA> BIGEVIL SA> TRIPWIRE SA> ANTIDRUG SA> EVILNUMBERS SA> SARE_RANDOM SA> SARE_ADULT <<== this is the important one for this problem SA> SARE_FRAUD SA> I forwarded a half-dozen of them to a person on this list, and he SA> pointd out that each body had a consistent mailing address in Toronto SA> (THUD! I missed that) so I will write a filter for that...however, SA> I'm still concerned that such explicit words are getting past these SA> filters... Understood. Forward them also to Matt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that address is inside the SARE_ADULT cf file), and he may be able to use the contents to improve that rule set. Bob Menschel
