On Fri, June 4, 2004 9:59, John Andersen said: > While trying to get the Spamcop-URI rules to work for SURBL, > I was never seeing any hits on these rules. > > After following every advice on the SURBL list, to no avail > I finally changed my procmail to use /usr/bin/spamassassin -a > instead of routing via spamc to spamd in my procmailrc. > All of a sudden the Surbl code started working (as did Razor2). > > So what's up with spamd? Is it incapable of running these newer > features? >
It should, and at least does Razor2. AFAIL spamd is just a wrapper around the spamassassin to keep it resident.
