On Friday 04 June 2004 05:36, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > On Fri, June 4, 2004 9:59, John Andersen said: > > While trying to get the Spamcop-URI rules to work for SURBL, > > I was never seeing any hits on these rules. > > > > After following every advice on the SURBL list, to no avail > > I finally changed my procmail to use /usr/bin/spamassassin -a > > instead of routing via spamc to spamd in my procmailrc. > > All of a sudden the Surbl code started working (as did Razor2). > > > > So what's up with spamd? Is it incapable of running these newer > > features? > > It should, and at least does Razor2. AFAIL spamd is just a wrapper around > the spamassassin to keep it resident.
Its my understanding that spamd is more than a wrapper. I understood it to be a C program that does the same thing as the SA perl. Anyone know for sure? -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
