Hi, On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 14:02:42 +0100 "Owen McShane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Someone Else wrote: > > Can someone explain this? Looks like at least half a dozen tests should > > have hit it. Furthermore, if the score is 0.0, why wasn't it > > autolearned? Thinking that maybe SA was just to busy at the time and > > took a break, I ran it through manually. Same thing, but it got > > autolearned as ham.
> What no one has mentioned yet is the presence of this header: > > X-Spam-Flag: NO > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but SA would never insert that header into a mail. > > The only time X-Spam-Flag is inserted is once SA has decided it's spam, > and it always only has the value Yes. > > Could your MTA have decided not to pass the mail through SA, as it > appeared to have already been filtered? Better to detect the X-Spam-Flag header in inbound mail and preprocess it with 'spamassassin -d' (to remove existing tagging) then pass it to the local copy of SA for (re)tagging. Or just do that for mail marked with "X-Spam-Status: No", if you trust an upstream MTA to tag messages properly. -- Bob
