> On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 14:02:42 +0100 "Owen McShane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > X-Spam-Flag: NO
>
> That implies, that the spammer added the header in order to avoid spam
> scanners.
>
>
> > Could your MTA have decided not to pass the mail through SA, as it appeared
> > to have already been filtered?
>
> That would be pretty silly, i dont think there is any MTA rules that check for
> the tag before the email has been scanned.
>
Really?
This from my exim config:
# When to scan a message :
# - it isn't already flagged as spam
# - it isn't already scanned
condition = "${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} {!eq
{$received_protocol}{spam-scanned}}{!eq {$h_X-SA-Do-Not-Run:}{Yes}}} {1}{0}}"
Owen
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach
Owen McShane Systems Administrator
http://www.vianetworks.co.uk Tel +44 (0)1925 484444
