[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got this mail yesterday and am mystified that SA gave it NO points... 0.0. I ran it through on the command line just to check, and nothing matched. I routinely catch nigerian emails but this one didn't trigger it. I'm not using Bayes filtering yet (I'm sure that would work, but I don't have enough spams yet) but I am surprised at this output using the standard rules. My config is SA 2.63 with no bayes and no network tests [though I might turn them on after too many of these].
> [...]
No problem with it here, and bayes only contributed slightly. SARE rules alone would've crossed my 5.0 threshold:
Content analysis details: (13.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_74 BODY: {7}Letter - punctuation - {4}Letter
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_81 BODY: {8}Letter - punctuation - {1}Letter
2.1 BAYES_90 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 90 to 99%
[score: 0.9710]
3.5 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X6 Matches 6+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam
1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X4 Matches 4+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam
1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X3 Matches 3+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam
1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X5 Matches 5+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam
