Yeah, that would be great. I'm not sure what to leave in Rules_du_jour - It is hard to keep track of any integration of rules and name changes.
I also noticed that Rules_du_jour won't work anymore (without modification) because of lint errors where some of the rulesets descriptions are over 50 chars long - for instance 70_sare_header_abuse.cf, 70_sare_ratware.cf, 70_sare_html.cf, bogus-virus-warnings.cf ... Does anybody know if these are being changed? Keep up the good work - it is much appreciated by myself and my clients. (You guys should setup a donation page :) ) Cheers Scott -----Original Message----- From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 24 June 2004 4:30 a.m. To: 'Dan Kohn'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SARE team: Post-3.0 rules Being discussed now, and has been in the back of my mind for a while as well. You are correct AFAIK on the assumptions you have made with : antidrug chickenpox not sure on virus warning rules. More will follow. --Chris >-----Original Message----- >From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 3:03 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: SARE team: Post-3.0 rules > > >To all those on the SARE team, plus experienced users: any chance I >could persuade to throw up a wiki (or just a reply email and I'll do >the >Wiki) with your personal recommendation on what SARE rules to >use with a >3.0 install. Specifically, I believe most of the drug rules are now in >the default ruleset so that also using the SARE file would be >a mistake. >But, I don't believe that, for instance, the virus warning >rules got in. >What about chickenpox?
