Replying to myself....kind of fun :) WOW! Thanks to everyone who emailed me off list. Response was overwhelming! It was a HUGE help. I can sum it all up in one word: DIVERSE!
While many setups had similarities, they were ALL different. There are some very interesting configs. Proves the point that with open source you can do just about anything. This definitely impacts the book. Because I realize that if someone wanted extreme detail on how to do this, it would be another book :) So I'm going to try to pick a 'most' generic kind of setup and suggest that. Thanks again to all who took the time. --Chris >-----Original Message----- >From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 9:44 AM >To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) >Subject: Feedback needed on SA as gateway. > > >Hi list dwellers. I need some feedback. I'm still tech editing >a book for >SA. Its making great progress and the publisher has taken >great steps to >listen to the community. One chapter I felt needed covering >was using SA on >an email gateway, and they agreed. > >Now I'm faced with the question of what the chapter should >cover. My setup >is extremely unique, because I didn't know better when I did >it :) So I'm >looking for the most popular setups to cover. So I'm asking 2 things: > >1) IF the Devs have a feel for what seems to be the most >popular SA gateway >setups, can you email me off list? > >2) Can people who use SA on a gateway, email me a brief setup >description? >MTA, internal server version, and definitely any info on user account >checking at the gateway? (LDAP or SQL.....) > >I'm thinking for the most part the chapter should be: >Any MTA, SA runs sitewide, gateway simply passes it on to >internal server >without checking if user is legit. > >Then maybe something on how to handle bayes feeding with this setup? > >Any offlist comment are welcome. Thanks! > >Chris Santerre >System Admin and SARE Ninja >http://www.rulesemporium.com >http://www.surbl.org >'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, >not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' >Charles Darwin >
