>-----Original Message----- >From: Sean Doherty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 5:48 AM >To: Fred >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: SURBLs and skip_rbl_checks > > >On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 19:50, Fred wrote: >> For a test to be considered a net test, it needs to have a >tflag set to net. >> For your surbl rules, they should all have: >> tflags SURBL_WHATEVER net >> This will force them to be skipped like you want. > >Thanks for the answer Fred. > >However these tests still get run when skip_rbl_checks = 1; >even if the tflags 'net' flag is set. > >The tests *do* get skipped if I specify the spamassassin -L >flag (local tests only). > >After a bit more digging I found that the spamCop-uri code >doesn't check the skip_rbl_checks settings as is done for >other rbl tests. If this is by design or not is a question >for the spamcop-uri developers. >
I believe it was never even thought about when the patch was made. But 3.0 will/should have support for skipping it. --Chris
