On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 04:09:26 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote: > Chris' answer is reasonable that the 3.0 code hopefully may > treat SURBLs like other RBLs in that skip_rbl_checks may work > as expected. Reading the source code would probably reveal > this if so.
I would assume that it is not too late to get this corrected in 3.0 final. Any 3.0-pre users care to check, and file a bugzilla report if necessary? John. -- -- Over 2400 webcams from ski resorts around the world - www.snoweye.com -- Translate your technical documents and web pages - www.tradoc.fr
