On Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 12:07:15 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:38 PM 7/14/2004, Eric W. Bates wrote:
>>As I add more SURBL's, are there generally matching rules which should
>>be canceled out (bigevil being an example)?
> sa-blacklist-uri and big/midevil are almost completely superceded by
> ws.surbl.org. All the other SURBLS are AFAIK unrelated.
Most of the lists are pretty unrelated, but both sc.surbl.org and
ab.surbl.org are mostly based on SpamCop reports. ab also
includes some locally-reported spam site domains.
Spamcop spamvertised site data in sc and ab differ mainly in
time periods and inclusion thresholds. Currently:
sc: 3 day time window, 10 SpamCop reports or more
with some manual nudging of known spammer domains
ab: 7 day time window, top 500 most often reported
SpamCop spamvertised sites, minus some www. duplicates,
plus some locally reported AbuseButler entries
Hope this helps. More information on the lists and their data
sources can be found on the SURBL lists page:
http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
