On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:43:23PM -0500, L. Clayton Parker wrote: > On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 21:37, L. Clayton Parker wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 21:19, Bob McClure Jr wrote: > > > > > What version of SA? > > > > > > Have you done any retraining using sa-learn? > > > > > > "man sa-learn" for more information. > > > > > > > I think it was 2.6.
To find out: spamassassin -V You'd do well to upgrade if it isn't 2.63. You could even try 3.0 beta. > > Nope, I haven't tried to retrain it. I never > > "trained" it in the first place. I don't think the bayesian filters are > > even turned on. In 2.63 they are turned on by default. Look in your ~/.spamassassin/ for bayes*. If they have current timestamps, it's using it. BTW, re: user_prefs - ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs is the operable file. user_prefs.cf is not. > > However, I was wrong about the mail getting through at a setting of 10, > > it was a fluke kicked out by a filter so that SA never saw it. > > Okay, I have a partial fix. It is now letting messages through and 10 > may be too high after all. It let through two messages that should have > scored as SPAM but didn't. Except that there are no scores in the > headers. I thought tagging is supposed to be on by default but I set the > -t switch and still no header output. Check your global settings in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > Lee > > -- > L. Parker > chief cook, bottle washer and sometime sysadmin > cacaphony.net Cheers, -- Bob McClure, Jr. Bobcat Open Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bobcatos.com Worry is the darkroom in which negatives are developed.
