Quoting Matt Linzbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-----Original Message-----
From: Pierre Thomson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sample scoring zero
Here's a sample with only a Bayes hit, and not very high at
that... anyone get better results?
http://frodo.bruderhof.com/norules.txt
pt
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,OB_URI_RBL,
RATWR10_MESSID,WS_URI_RBL autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.6 RATWR10_MESSID Message-ID has ratware pattern (HEXHEX.HEXHEX@)
* 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 50 to 56%
* [score: 0.5320]
* 4.0 OB_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in ob.surbl.org
* [vybx.f.antioch8386drygs.us is blacklisted in URI]
[RBL at ob.surbl.org]
* 3.0 WS_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in sa-blacklist
* [vybx.f.antioch8386drygs.us is blacklisted in URI]
[RBL at ws.surbl.org]
Content analysis details: (5.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 BAYES_44 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 44 to 50%
[score: 0.4585]
1.1 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence between 51 and 100
[cf: 100]
3.0 WS_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in sa-blacklist
[vybx.f.antioch8386drygs.us is blacklisted in URI]
[RBL at ws.surbl.org]
1.0 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
