I'm surprised no one has mentioned 1.0.25.

Taking into consideration the points already mentioned (which I agree
with) regarding "cartoony" logos, 1.0.25 stands out for me as being a
very sharp, bright, attractive, professional and modern design.  

Not only that but it describes pictorially exactly what SA does (i.e.
filtering) whereas a lot of the others leave the viewer to guess what it
does.  However, I suppose you could level the same criticism at Apache
itself - it's not like the feather actually *means* anything.

For what it's worth I'd wager that when your average user thinks of the
word "SpamAssassin", or hears of "SpamAssassin filtering my email" then
they will just think "spam blocking".  I personally think the semantics
of how it does it & the concept of varying levels of "spamness" is
beyond the comprehension (or interest) of most people.  In that respect
I think clouding the logo with different coloured letters depending on
level of spam would only confuse everyone, including sysadmins who had
never heard of SA.

I agree with the "ham" comment - mainly because its not as synonymous as
"spam".

Daz

PS.  1.0.25 for the win!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy McGough
> Sent: 04 August 2004 08:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!!
> 
> On 3 Aug 2004 Marc Kool ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > my 2 ct: I like 1.0.33 the most.
> 
> I also like the ones with a shuriken, both 1.0.33 and
> 1.0.27. A couple thoughts:
> 
> * SpamAssassin does not necessarily identify spam and non-spam.
> Instead it stratifies messages into
> 
>    almost surely spam
>    likely spam
>    unknown
>    likely non spam
>    almost surely non spam
> 
> So instead of having the shuriken with all brown envelopes and
> one blue envelope, it might make more sense to use colors of the
> rainbow (as in 1.0.27) for the colors of the envelopes. This is
> the metaphor that I use on my reverse spam filtering page, which
> is here:
> 
>    <http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/spam/>
> 
> 
> * I think it is better not to use the word "ham" anywhere in the
> logo (e.g., don't say "Keep the ham, kill the spam") because some
> people will be offended by using the word "ham" to describe their
> "good mail."
> 
> Nancy
> Infinite Ink
> www.ii.com
> 
> PS - I agree that this is an amazing collection!

Reply via email to