Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 02:03 PM 8/6/2004, Jim Maul wrote:
Where is it getting this -0.655? the score shown above is 1.1?
It's recomputing the score of the message as if bayes were disabled, which is why it jumped to score set 1, and then back to 3.
This behavior is intentional to prevent bayes rules from self feeding, and is in the documentation.
Probably the biggest situation you've got on your hands is why did the message hit RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED. Was it *really* sent by a bondedsender listed server, or is your trusted_networks misconfigured?
I dont have any trusted networks configured. Never even bothered with it. The
sender was fool.com.
Does anyone know if they are really trusted? It seems weird to me that they would be trusted and also send out messages that hit INVALID_MSGID.
I guess anything is possible however.
So now i guess my question is. How can i prevent this type of thing in the future? I dont want a message that hits a mess of other positive rules to be autolearned. Im afraid ham messages of this spammy nature are going to influence my bayes database in a negative way.
Thanks,
Jim
