Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I dont have any trusted networks configured. Never even bothered with > it. The sender was fool.com. > > Does anyone know if they are really trusted?
They are a Bonded Sender, see http://www.bondedsender.org/ for the terms of the program. I assume you signed up with the Motley Fool at some point. > It seems weird to me that they would be trusted and also send out > messages that hit INVALID_MSGID. It could be an overaggressive rule, the score is not that high, after all. Or, their software could be somewhat broken, that's not exactly unusual. > I guess anything is possible however. > > So now i guess my question is. How can i prevent this type of thing > in the future? I dont want a message that hits a mess of other > positive rules to be autolearned. Im afraid ham messages of this > spammy nature are going to influence my bayes database in a negative > way. It's working as designed and you WANT to learn on this sort of ham. If you only learned on completely RFC-2822 conforming and plain-looking ham, then Bayes wouldn't work so well. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
