> [David Abrahams] >> Any idea why I'm not getting an answer? [Tim Peters] > Perhaps because you've become the leading expert on sb_imapfilter ;-)
Or it could be because the wife of the previously leading expert on sb_imapfilter is due to have their first child any day now ;). Those round tuits are pretty scarce here at the moment. sb_imapfilter has always been an unloved child. Unlike most of the rest of the SpamBayes code, it's wasn't a scratching an itch, but shutting up people asking for it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Back then I had time to spare, so Tim Stone & I put it together - I didn't have an IMAP account at the time. I still dislike IMAP, so use POP for all my accounts, so although I probably know the code better than anyone else (although it has been a while), I rarely exercise it. I've put it up for adoption on spambayes-dev at various times, but no-one has taken up the offer. I'll try to take a look at your message & the problem this weekend. I know that the code I added between 1.1a1 and 1.1a2 to both sb_server and sb_imapfilter to deal with the "changed database type causes a crash" bug wasn't as well designed as it should have been, and does cause the odd problem. I plan to fix that as soon as I can. =Tony.Meyer _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
