Tony Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> [David Abrahams] >>> Any idea why I'm not getting an answer? > > [Tim Peters] >> Perhaps because you've become the leading expert on sb_imapfilter ;-) > > Or it could be because the wife of the previously leading expert on > sb_imapfilter is due to have their first child any day now ;). Those > round tuits are pretty scarce here at the moment.
Understood. Congratulations, though! > > sb_imapfilter has always been an unloved child. Unlike most of the > rest of the SpamBayes code, it's wasn't a scratching an itch, but > shutting up people asking for it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Back then > I had time to spare, so Tim Stone & I put it together - I didn't have > an IMAP account at the time. > > I still dislike IMAP, so use POP for all my accounts, I don't see POP as an option if I want server-side mail storage. > so although I probably know the code better than anyone else > (although it has been a while), I rarely exercise it. I've put it > up for adoption on spambayes-dev at various times, but no-one has > taken up the offer. I might be willing to be trained toward that end (there's lots I want to do with IMAP and so it would be good to learn how), but I'm sure not competent to do it right now. > I'll try to take a look at your message & the problem this weekend. Thanks, I really appreciate it. > I know that the code I added between 1.1a1 and 1.1a2 to both > sb_server and sb_imapfilter to deal with the "changed database type > causes a crash" bug wasn't as well designed as it should have been, > and does cause the odd problem. I plan to fix that as soon as I can. Thanks again, Tony -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
