I look forward to this porting development Skip, thank you! = ) I still use SB with Windows 7 Pro and 2010 Outlook.
Current stats below: Database has 2047 good and 4629 spam. Messages classified: 182,390 Good: 55,249 (30.3%) Spam: 123,777 (67.9%) Unsure: 3364 (1.8%) 6 false positives...LOL! Incredible..... Please let me know how I can help as well, regarding testing in various environments. Take care, Erik -----Original Message----- From: spambayes-dev [mailto:spambayes-dev-bounces+kirebrow=yahoo....@python.org] On Behalf Of Skip Montanaro Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 8:35 PM To: Tim Peters Cc: spambayes-dev@python.org Subject: Re: [spambayes-dev] Anybody still have a test ham/spam database? > Sorry, Skip - I don't. And I was surprised just now to see that we apparently never checked test data files into the Sourceforge source tree either! > > But it shouldn't matter. SB learns pretty quickly, and it would be better to use _current_ examples of spam and ham anyway (their characteristics change over time). Sure, but constructing a suitable ham/spam corpus from scratch is a non-trivial task, as you no doubt remember. I could start with the collection on mail.python.org, but I suspect I would probably let a personal email or three leak through into what's ostensibly a public database. (SpamBayes has been doing a pretty good job over the years at its original assigned task.) I am looking to insure that a Py3 port of SpamBayes works the same as the Py2 code. Skip _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
