> I do not believe that it is a rule problem: > > I have only one rule, and that moves messages from a particular > address to their own folder. None of the messages with which I have > had problems have that return address.
Ok, we can rule that out. > But, you mentioned another instance of SpamBayes: > > I have two systems that read the same Outlook PST file (using Public > Outlook). Each of those systems had an instance of SpamBayes. On the > local machine SpamBayes sorted incoming messages, and it was on the > local machine that I had the problem described below. > > The remote machine's instance of SpamBayes was used (only very rarely) > to train on messages that were incorrectly sorted on the local > machine. > > Though I understand nothing about the mechanism of potential > interference, there is that possibility. These two aren't accessing the same SpamBayes database at the same time are they? This wouldn't result in this problem, but could lead to database corruption. > I have left SpamBayes on the remote machine, but have disabled it by > un-checking. > > I will run that way to see if it eliminates the problem I have been > having. I'm not sure what might be happening, but this certainly does sound like a good candidate for the cause of the problem. You could have a look at the SpamBayes log for the remote machine and see if it is moving any messages. =Tony.Meyer -- Please always include the list ([email protected]) in your replies (reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
