> When I get to work tomorrow, I'll get one or two people to > set it to 9 and send what I find.
Thanks. > I don't know if this might be a red herring or not, but this > all started shortly after installing Windows 2003 Server SP1. > There were some pretty big RPC changes and I'm wondering if > this might be a low-level problem too, perhaps even with Python > and SP1. I don't have any version of Windows Server myself, but I've seen messages from other people on the list who are using 2003 SP1 with SpamBayes, so it ought to work - OTOH this is the sort of problem that could easily be missed. Ryan, Bob: were either of you using Windows Server 2003 SP1? If so, do you have any idea whether you've seen this problem? (The 'mark as read' option only sporadically working; this isn't the folder list update problem). > I'm really grasping but a couple of these users get tens of > thousands of messages per day. It seems to be worse on busy accounts. > Myself and another guy only get a few hundred messages a day and we're > not seeing this. I was thinking there might be some sort of contention > going on between Spambayes moving the messages and Outlook/Exchange > updating read or not read flags. Moving the message and setting the 'read' flag are done separately - since the move works, I'm guessing it's some sort of issue with the latter. It's done with a MAPI call, so maybe something did change with the new version - I would hope that it would raise an error (and therefore create a log entry) if so, though. =Tony.Meyer -- Please always include the list (spambayes at python.org) in your replies (reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
