[Jesse Pelton] > Yuck. Don't wanna go there. > > I'm pretty sure I've seen discussion on the list of a training regimen > that involved discarding aged messages (you could even have been > involved),
Testing frameworks hold on to all messages for as long as a test is running, and store whatever mappings they need in RAM (like Python dicts) for the duration; this is a matter of minutes (not months), and has no UI, no provision for recovering from errors, etc. > but I guess that would be done by separately maintaining a corpus of ham > and spam that is periodically used to train from scratch. Does that make > sense? You could do that, and it would be especially easy if using a friendly mail-store format (like Unixish mbox format, not Outlook .pst). _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
