[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry, but I'm going to pour gasoline on this fire. > > I dislike spam too, but the idea that we have to strike back with all > the algorithmic force of the mathematical universe is just nuts.
Bob, I agree, paper spam is a real environmental problem. I spent quite a while getting myself off mailing lists and now I'm down to about 10 pieces a week. In San Francisco recycling it is easy. I suggest that you pursue both getting yourself off lists and in getting a recycling system set up where you live. But e-mail spam is a bit different in that it has a malware payload about 30% of the time so the less knowledgeable among us get burned and become zombies to spit out millions of additional spam/malware e-mail. >From this point of view it is my opinion that we'd all be better off if the mail did not get delivered in the first place. This is why I suggest that adding an additional layer of robustness might prove useful. Best, Allen
_______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
