Thomas> If an anti-spam product were truly finished it would delete all
Thomas> spam, keep all good mail, and never need
Thomas> updating/tweaking/training. Spambayes is therefore not
Thomas> finished.
Thomas> IMO, the moment a single spam message enters my inbox, that is
Thomas> an error. The moment a good e-mail that should have entered my
Thomas> inbox is, instead, deleted, that is an error as well. For the
Thomas> most part, Spambayes works, but it falls flat on its face quite
Thomas> often.
Do you have time to contribute to making SpamBayes better? Those of us who
work on SpamBayes or who have done so in the past have done it in our spare
time. Nobody is getting rich off this code ignoring your complaints that it
isn't perfect.
--
Skip Montanaro - s...@pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/
"XML sucks, dictionaries rock" - Dave Beazley
_______________________________________________
SpamBayes@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
Info/Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
